An Atheist Afterlife

By Isuru Abeysinghe
$0.00 Rating: 1 star1 star1 star0.5 star
(3.50 based on 6 reviews)

Published: July 07, 2012
Words: 2,099 (approximate)
Language: English
ISBN: 9781476476445


Short description

A scientific theory about the possibility of an afterlife from an atheist perspective. This short and concise document deals within the realm of observable science and basic mathematics to argue that all humans are inherantly immortal.

Extended description

A scientific theory about the possibility of an afterlife from an atheist perspective. This short and concise document deals within the realm of observable science and basic mathematics to argue that all humans are inherantly immortal. This work brings together the principals of statistical opportunity, chaos theory, set theory and recent discoveries about the big bang to present an argument that is both philosophical and scientific - without resorting to any mythological or supernatural assumptions.

Tags

atheism, afterlife, theory of relativity, chaos theory, big bang theory, cosmic background radiation, statistical theory, ambiogenesis

Available ebook reading formats

This book is free. How to download ebooks to e-reading devices and apps.
Format Full Book
Online Reading (HTML, good for sampling in web browser)View
Kindle (.mobi for Kindle devices and Kindle apps)Download
Epub (Apple iPad/iBooks, Nook, Sony Reader, Kobo, and most e-reading apps including Stanza, Aldiko, Adobe Digital Editions, others)Download
PDF (good for reading on PC, or for home printing)Download
RTF (readable on most word processors)Download
LRF (Use only for older model Sony Readers that don't support .epub)Download
Palm Doc (PDB) (for Palm reading devices)Download
Plain Text (download) (flexible, but lacks much formatting)Download
Plain Text (view) (viewable as web page)View

Reviews

Log-in to write a Review   Log-in to add a Video Review

Review by: Magnus Brown on June 11, 2013 : star
Was disappointed at lack of science. Would be an excellent starting point for a religion, however.

Firstly, there is factual inaccuracy in explanation of probability. A probability of 1 means certainty, 100%, not "more likely to occur than not." Not enough is known about the Big Bang to know that we are in an infinite cycle of universes - this is merely an interesting suggestion - and all evidence is that the universe we're in won't end, but rather keep expanding forever. Chaos Theory does not directly support point (5) - this needs to be shown. I don't think the argument is actually valid, but, in any case, the conclusion is not what you claim. Another copy of me being alive in the future does not feel like a continuation of me - hardly an afterlife.
(review of free book)

Review by: Darrell Brock on Dec. 17, 2012 : star star star star
At the most fundamental level humans are energy, and yes, energy can change forms. However, energy has not yet been shown to be sentient, or even displayed a potential to be so, therefore to assume that we will somehow guard this sentience after we die seems wrong, however the argument is framed.

Continued sentience after death is what an afterlife is, is it not?

I am sure you had fun writing this, that's why the four stars.
(review of free book)

Review by: Markus Baad on Dec. 10, 2012 : star star star star
Fun! I didn't really understand everything, but I like being able to say I am immortal because the odds say so.
(review of free book)

Review by: James Jarman on July 22, 2012 : star star star star
Can I point you to the direction of Kurt Godel. He was arguably the worlds greatest logician and was as convinced of the 'afterlife' as he was of the truth of his theorems. You may also like the ontological arguments.
(review of free book)

Review by: K Y on July 10, 2012 : star star star star
It is interesting to think of having an afterlife exists in a 'different' world. Good read.
(review of free book)

Review by: Ardy on July 07, 2012 : star star star star
An interesting and in depth discussion. However, as with every religious argument, whether that religion is Christianity, Bhuddism, or Atheism, the arguments always sound better from your own point of view. I should know, having debated my own faith countless times with everyone from atheists to pagans to wiccans. Once you believe you are right, your arguments will always lead to the same place. That's okay. As nothing I can say can convince you of the divinity of Christ, nothing you can say can convince me that there is no God. The debates themselves are more for the debaters than for those they "argue" with. I like your conclusion. I have never seen an atheist argue for an afterlife before, even if our views of what that afterlife would be are vastly different. This is a great discussion starter for people of any belief system. Thanks for this work.
(review of free book)

Report this book