Nonfiction » Philosophy » Religious philosophy
Nonfiction » Religion and Spirituality » Atheism/Agnosticism
| Format | Full Book |
|---|---|
| Online Reading (HTML, good for sampling in web browser) | View |
| Kindle (.mobi for Kindle devices and Kindle apps) | Download |
| Epub (Apple iPad/iBooks, Nook, Sony Reader, Kobo, and most e-reading apps including Stanza, Aldiko, Adobe Digital Editions, others) | Download |
| PDF (good for reading on PC, or for home printing) | Download |
| RTF (readable on most word processors) | Download |
| LRF (Use only for older model Sony Readers that don't support .epub) | Download |
| Palm Doc (PDB) (for Palm reading devices) | Download |
| Plain Text (download) (flexible, but lacks much formatting) | Download |
| Plain Text (view) (viewable as web page) | View |
Review by:
Magnus Brown
on June 11, 2013 :
Was disappointed at lack of science. Would be an excellent starting point for a religion, however.
Firstly, there is factual inaccuracy in explanation of probability. A probability of 1 means certainty, 100%, not "more likely to occur than not." Not enough is known about the Big Bang to know that we are in an infinite cycle of universes - this is merely an interesting suggestion - and all evidence is that the universe we're in won't end, but rather keep expanding forever. Chaos Theory does not directly support point (5) - this needs to be shown. I don't think the argument is actually valid, but, in any case, the conclusion is not what you claim. Another copy of me being alive in the future does not feel like a continuation of me - hardly an afterlife.
(review of free book)
Review by:
Darrell Brock
on Dec. 17, 2012 :
At the most fundamental level humans are energy, and yes, energy can change forms. However, energy has not yet been shown to be sentient, or even displayed a potential to be so, therefore to assume that we will somehow guard this sentience after we die seems wrong, however the argument is framed.
Continued sentience after death is what an afterlife is, is it not?
I am sure you had fun writing this, that's why the four stars.
(review of free book)
Review by:
Markus Baad
on Dec. 10, 2012 :
Fun! I didn't really understand everything, but I like being able to say I am immortal because the odds say so.
(review of free book)
Review by:
James Jarman
on July 22, 2012 :
Can I point you to the direction of Kurt Godel. He was arguably the worlds greatest logician and was as convinced of the 'afterlife' as he was of the truth of his theorems. You may also like the ontological arguments.
(review of free book)
Review by:
K Y
on July 10, 2012 :
It is interesting to think of having an afterlife exists in a 'different' world. Good read.
(review of free book)
Review by:
Ardy
on July 07, 2012 :
An interesting and in depth discussion. However, as with every religious argument, whether that religion is Christianity, Bhuddism, or Atheism, the arguments always sound better from your own point of view. I should know, having debated my own faith countless times with everyone from atheists to pagans to wiccans. Once you believe you are right, your arguments will always lead to the same place. That's okay. As nothing I can say can convince you of the divinity of Christ, nothing you can say can convince me that there is no God. The debates themselves are more for the debaters than for those they "argue" with. I like your conclusion. I have never seen an atheist argue for an afterlife before, even if our views of what that afterlife would be are vastly different. This is a great discussion starter for people of any belief system. Thanks for this work.
(review of free book)