Nonfiction » Philosophy » Methodology

The distinction between falsification and refutation in the demarcation problem of Karl Popper
Price: Free! Words: 11,620. Language: English. Published: March 7, 2019. Categories: Nonfiction » Philosophy » Methodology, Nonfiction » Philosophy » Criticism
Despite the criticism of Karl Popper's falsifiability theory for the demarcation between science and non-science, mainly pseudo-science, this criterion is still very useful, and perfectly valid after it was perfected by Popper and his followers.
Imre Lakatos: Euristica și toleranța metodologică
Price: Free! Words: 10,100. Language: Romanian. Published: February 15, 2019. Categories: Nonfiction » Philosophy » Methodology, Nonfiction » Science & Nature » History of Science
Pentru a analiza conceptele de euristica și toleranță metodologică dezvoltate de Lakatos, m-am concentrat pe secțiunea ”Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes”, publicată pentru prima dată ca articol în 1970 și apoi în cartea The methodology of scientific research programmes, Volume I
Distincția dintre falsificare și respingere în problema demarcației la Karl Popper
Price: Free! Words: 11,650. Language: Romanian. Published: January 23, 2019. Categories: Nonfiction » Philosophy » Methodology, Nonfiction » Science & Nature » Research & Methodology
În ciuda criticilor teoriei falsificabilității propuse de Karl Popper pentru demarcarea între știință și ne-știință, în principal pseudoștiință, acest criteriu este încă foarte util, și perfect valabil după perfecționarea lui de către Popper și adepții lui.
Elementos de un vitalismo trascendental
Price: Free! Words: 9,020. Language: Spanish. Published: July 22, 2018. Categories: Nonfiction » Philosophy » Methodology, Nonfiction » Philosophy » Metaphysics
¿Cómo es que pienso? Eso mismo me pregunté, y eso mismo aquí intenté responderme. Tímidamente busqué de a poco encaminar mi pensmiento y poder trasladarlo al mundo escrito, abandonar la comodidad de mi propia confidencia e ir fuera de mí, exhortado a poder explicarme y saber de dónde es que debo comenzar cuando quiero pensar, cuáles son mis principios.
Modele Scientifique du Proces Electoral
Price: Free! Words: 7,420. Language: French. Published: January 21, 2018. Categories: Nonfiction » Social Science » Political science, Nonfiction » Philosophy » Methodology
La représentation comme va problème scientifique de mesure. Il y a à notre disposition quatre échelles pour mesurer la représentation. L'échelle nominale, l'échelle ordinale, l'échelle à intervalles, et l'échelle à raison. Le scrutin transférable est un système co-ordonné du vote au dépouillement, dans un ordre de préférence empirique 1, 2, 3,. à l'ordre rational de 1, 2, 3,. membres majoritaires.
Make Way for You: Tips for getting out of your own way
You set the price! Words: 13,050. Language: English. Published: July 26, 2016. Categories: Nonfiction » Self-improvement » Creativity, Nonfiction » Philosophy » Methodology
This is the first volume in a collection of freely written thoughts that helped me get through some of my own personal barriers and bullsh*t excuses. My hope is that they can help you in a similar way.
Geo Spirit for Environment and Earth Leadership
Price: Free! Words: 17,310. Language: English. Published: June 9, 2016. Categories: Nonfiction » Science & Nature » Ecology & Environment, Nonfiction » Philosophy » Methodology
Geo Spirit is the consciousness for harmony and well-being of the Earth. To understand the environment, ecology and earth leadership to act. This book contains a lot of sensible thoughts and down to earth wisdom - Eddie Leong, Singapore. Geo Spirit is reckoning of true human responsibility, Leadership and doing right in its true meaning - Chris Kajo, Kenya.
The Engineer's Argument: A philosophical argument against intelligent design
Price: $0.99 USD. Words: 9,070. Language: English. Published: April 18, 2015 by armin.navabi@gmail.com. Categories: Nonfiction » Science & Nature » Philosophy of Science, Nonfiction » Philosophy » Methodology
This book aims to give logically consistent reasoning for the dismissal of the idea of intelligent design through philosophical discourse based on given evidence of how our universe works. It is my hope that I can offer many pieces of evidence that show such an idea of an intelligent designer is not only logically inconsistent but also absurd.