Atheist Afterlife

Rated 3.00/5 based on 2 reviews
This is a limited distribution re-publication the original release of the e-book later released with the alternate title "Ethereal Pixie-rings of Mercy" with original artwork by Keith Draws. More

Available ebook formats: epub mobi pdf lrf pdb txt html

First 25% Sample: epub mobi (Kindle) lrf more Online Reader
About Rob J Meijer

Rob is a software-engineering professional who pays his bills by building computer forensic and information security products.

In 2013 Rob added the writing of short science fiction stories to his already long list of interests that includes nutritional science, applied mathematics, anthropology, power lifting and public speaking on geeky subjects.

Rob's first two shorts are an homage to the memory of his father an atheist who entertained let’s say rather SciFi-ish ideas about the origin of man. During a 6-week stay in west Africa, the soaring heat combined with the tiny ants that kept infesting his apartment and local customs helped Rob find the inspiration for turning what he remembered from his father’s wild theories into a coherent SciFi story. Since then Rob has continued to work on a series of shorts with related subjects that he hopes to one day release as a printed bundle.

While Rob loves both technology and his e-books, he feels a big draw to the idea of holding a self-published book in his hands and feeling and even smelling the reality of it. His ultimate goal is thus to self-publish a bundle of seven shorts that he can hold in his hands and smell ;-)

Also by This Author

Reviews

Review by: Barry Meijer on June 28, 2015 :
An intriguing and daring novelette that will be an uncomfortable read for most readers. Uncomfortable in way like Lolita or The Wasp Factory.

It's dense, it' s brainy and you'll need to keep paying attention at different levels. Even than you will probably need to read it twice.

The protagonist isn't even close to being likable. The universe created in this story and especially the part about the afterlife is disturbing in a way that will stick in your mind for days after reading this short read.

The heavy handed use of christian religious lingo combined with the essentially non-religious depiction of christian deities and the afterlife (somewhere halfway between a 1960s psychedelic drug related theme and modern string-theory inspired science fiction) will add significantly to the discomfort.

I don't think there will be many people who will 'enjoy' the experience of reading this novelette. Its the kind of story though that has the capacity to really mess with and stick in your mind.

I think the author could have skipped the epilogue and make it even more uncomfortable (in a good way). The epilogue adds a kind of happy ending that I feel detracts from the disturbing quality of this short work of fiction.
(review of free book)
Review by: Dean McIntosh on March 20, 2015 :
So much conflict between the potential and the result.

Atheist Afterlife has so many problems that I find it very difficult to give it a rating in good conscience. It has an idea, it has a destination, but it does not seem to know how to get from A to B. I am trying to restrain myself from descending into nastiness when I speak of what is wrong with it. But this is a difficult thing to do, and unfortunately I am not able to recommend the story to friends in good conscience.

It is very confusing to try and speak of the message of the story. Does Rob Meijer want to beat the audience's head with a "ha ha all atheists are fools" tone? Or is he trying to convey that the believers are so limited in their imagination that they do not see what they see, so to speak? It is really quite confusing and difficult.

The plot, near as I can discern, goes something like this. A brilliant research scientist is diagnosed with a terminal disease that eats away at his ability to perform research. Said disease also takes his wife, children, and indeed most if not all of his family, but the exact nature or mechanism of the disease is never explored. Indeed, aside from one character through whom the scientist contemplates the possibility of his work being continued, we really never explore the characters nor the research scientist as people.

I will give you a sample of the text in order to clarify my point.

"No, religion was not being purged from the world as David had set out to do, for from it. It was being cleansed of misinterpretations and broken lines that had diluted old rituals for milennia. More importantly, bad doctrine was being purged from the world. Science and religion were quickly becoming one, and humanity was setting out to take up a much more central place in creation than it ever had."

This is literally the third to last paragraph in the story, and the problem is that the entire story is written like this. There is no device by which the central protagonist grows more confused or spaced-out as the story progresses. In fact, through the whole tell rather than show manner, the story never reaches anything beyond "I want to convince you of a compatibility between science and religion". And even THAT, I am uncertain is what the author aims for.

Simply put, this story should never have been published. It is not even a narrative. At best, it is a collection of thought processes from inside the head of a narrator. At no point does it do anything to support any of the statements it makes through its protagonist. It simply muses on and on about the character's thoughts and feelings as perhaps four central events take place around said author.

I will give this author credit for trying, as there is a story concept buried in here that I am certain I myself could make a great fruit out of by proxy of Kronisk or Linula, my two hell-in-a-teacup concept characters. But because we are never told what mysterious illness kills the protagonist or how it works, what the protagonist's research does, or why we should believe in the reality the protagonist finds himself in after he dies, it is really hard to say anything complimentary about the end result.

My final comment here is that the story needs far more fleshing out and exploration in terms of its characters and what motivates them. But I feel frightened to say that largely because the writing style, which I believe I have sufficiently quoted, is not going to improve any over the span of a hundred thousand words. I believe that Mister Meijer could write an interesting piece of work along these lines. But first, he needs to sit down and really think about every aspect of his writing style.

Hence, I am giving Atheist Afterlife two stars. There is a redeemable idea here that could be done well. But on the basis of this short volume, I believe a lot more work is needed.
(reviewed 2 days after purchase)
Report this book