Augmented Newton’s law
The existing law of universal gravitation of Isaac Newton is represented only by one half of view, and it is interpreted mistakenly. However, even in this form, it is considered one of the universal laws of nature. Here is a paradox, which is solved by the proposed work, complementing the law by its second half. More
Why does the Earth rotate? Why do bodies of different mass fall down with the same acceleration? Newton existing law of universal gravitation does not give convincing answers upon these and other questions because it is represented by one half of the law and it is interpreted incorrectly. However, it is considered, and by right, the fundamental law of the Universe. Here is a paradox that is solved by the presented hypothesis. Wherein, I. Newton law formula of universal gravitation has taken its "legal" place. Law misinterpretation predetermined the wrong interpretation of gravitational constant as just a factor of proportionality. Based on the content of hypothesis, the gravitational constant is filled with other physical sense. Only a true physical meaning of the gravitational constant identifies the missing second half of the law. Right from the inception of the law, the simplicity of its formula evoked the universal admiration. The second half of the law, in our understanding, was obliged to comply with it, and the same simple it is. It would seem that the fundamental law of the universe should be increasingly used in the daily practice of people of Earth, and this discrepancy can be explained only by its incompleteness.
The hypothesis is interesting for both physicists and lyricists. Should the author have left several formulas in books in which the gravitational constant are shown and there is a focuse on the second half of the law because the text even more than is necessary for a clear idea of the hypothesis. However, physicists are meticulous people; they believe more the figures underpinning the text than the text itself. Therefore, the formulas are for them, and the lyrics may not look into the formula, without prejudice to the understanding of the hypothesis.
Available ebook formats: