Comments on Joshua Lee Harris’s Essay (2017) Analogy in Aquinas

This work comments on an essay published by Joshua Lee Harris in the January 2017 edition of Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers (volume 34(1), pages 33-56), under the title, “Analogy in Aquinas: The Alston-Wolterstorff Debate Revisited”. My goal is to re-articulate Harris’s work in the specialized language of the category-based nested form. More

Available ebook formats: epub mobi pdf lrf pdb txt html

First 7% Sample: epub mobi (Kindle) lrf more Online Reader
About Razie Mah

See website for bio.

Read Razie Mah's Smashwords Interview
Learn more about Razie Mah
About the Series: Considerations of Jacques Maritain, John Deely and Thomistic Approaches to the Questions of These Times
Two models are used to appreciate now-forgotten paths stretching from Baroque scholastics to the present day. These models are the triadic structure of judgment and the category-based nested form. Two recent intellects stand out. One is Jacques Maritain. Born in France, he comes to North America around the time of the second world war. He is keenly interested in how to recover a scholastic approach within this world of modern science. Another is John Deely, whose recent death marks the end of a long career as both a Thomist and a semiotician. Deely confronts the philosophers of the day in a very entertaining manner. This series contains comments on articles from journals such as the American Catholic Philosophical Association, Faith and Philosophy, as well as books, including Daniel Novotny's excellent works on the Baroque scholastics. This series is not a course. It is a place to sample ideas. I encourage readers to consider both the original and the comments. They may be read in tandem or in sequence.

Also in Series: Considerations of Jacques Maritain, John Deely and Thomistic Approaches to the Questions of These Times

Also by This Author

Reviews

This book has not yet been reviewed.
Report this book