Applied Apologetics provides scripture-based apologetic Books that make an impact on non-specialists, non-academics, as well as scholars.
You receive powerful resources that train you to effectively dialogue with atheists, cultists, and agnostics.
The deep intellectual truths distilled from ancient and modern scholars are the intellectual influence for these new writings.
Friedrich Ludwig Gottlob Frege was a renowned logician and mathematician. Significant features of his work can be utilized to advance the notion that the laws of logic are not the product of matter and its supporting capability. Without God as the uppermost mind and the source of logic one weakens, beyond recovery, the justification that one can trust human reason.
Selected similar features concerning waking and dreaming renders it plausible that a dream could appear as genuine reality. Descartes argues that similar thoughts men have while awake can occur while asleep--it is plausible that a dream could feel real, then, for all men know, we are dreaming. I contend that Christian ontology that extend from it provide a means to discern reality from a dream.
The immutable God of Christian theism provides the essential pre-environment for immutable necessities. Strict materialistic atheism, due to its mutability, cannot supply the necessary a priori conditions for immutable truths; therefore it results in absurdity.
The doctrines of reincarnation and illusion in Hindu thought are not possible asylums for salvation. The true God has aseity and is supreme—He has the power to offer actual redemption. If everything is an illusion, that would include the Hindu concepts of reincarnation and illusion. An Apologetics Paper.
I argue that what is true depends on and presupposes what there is. I maintain this position in the face of all sundry ontic kinds and sorts since all things exist and are sustained by God. God is and He is ontologically necessary for truth. An Apologetics Paper.
This essay will prove from scripture that the triune God alone is God and that the Watchtower (WT) is a false religious group founded upon false prophecies from a false deity. The tactic I employ strikes at the foundation of the WT belief system: the ontological status of their god/gods. Thus I do not utilize much of the traditional means to refute them.
Without presupposing the existence of God, one cannot account for analytic assessments. Linguistic truths utilized within critical analysis would be impossible without the biblical God since analytical ventures utilize immutable universals which God grounds. One source of Kantianism insufficiency: it cannot account for the essential operational features of reason. An Apologetics Paper.
Muslims profess that Muhammad is the final and greatest prophet sent from Allah. I maintain that the Qur’an is inconsistent since it ascribes outstanding attributes and titles to Jesus Christ that are not said of Muhammad. Jesus Christ is unique, exceptional, and superior; even Islamic scripture acknowledges such. An Apologetics Paper.
Xavier the atheist argues Christians cannot “reconcile their belief on slavery, God’s nature, and His proclamations on slavery” within scripture. He discussed other issues and presented a few additional claims, but the heart of his essay centered on the alleged inconsistency of an immutably good God issuing laws regulating slavery. An Apologetic Paper.
Many Muslims contend that Allah is true because the Koran reveals he is, and the Koran is true because Allah says so. Additionally they may try to prove the Koran by positing Muhammad and proving Muhammad by positing the Koran. This argumentation is viciously circular. This non-academic Paper is for non-specialists as well as scholars.
Mormonism avows that the material cosmos, humanity, and gods are all eternal. I will argue that the LDS view of polytheism has many theological, philosophical, and ontological difficulties. Non-Academic Paper for scholars and non-specialists.
This paper seeks to demonstrate that moral absolutes exist and that atheism lacks the ontological grounding for moral absolutes. Atheists can know what is moral; they can know right from wrong. Nonetheless, atheism lacks an objective ontic ground to issue objective moral values.